It’s quite simple, he’s the foreign minister. He’s responsible for it. He’s got the same authority and power Zarif used to have in drafting the agreement. People have every right to be angry and protest against this “brilliant” strategist. During the negotiations, 3 days before the US/Israel attacked Iran, Araghchi made a public interview in english saying that it’s fine if they kill our leader, because we have a mechanism that just replaces him with a new one instead of saying that we’ll burn the region into fire. What kind of message does that give? That it’s fine to kill our leader. A little after that, 3 days to be exact, they betrayed the negotiations and killed the leader. As a diplomat, as a negotiator, you don’t give the enemy this signal, especially not in english, that the they would not face any repercussions if they kill our beloved leader. No, he’s saying this mechanism exists if they assassinate the leader. We’re not talking about military commanders that can be replaced, we’re talking about a leader. People have every right to be angry at him.